|
Emergency
Vehicle Safe Operations for Volunteer & Small Combination
Emergency Service Organizations
The following
report is the result of a cooperative project between the
United States Fire Administration (USFA) and The National
Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC) and include recommendations
from the USFA and Department of Transportation Intelligent
Transportation System to develop the Fire Service Emergency
Vehicle Safety Initiative in 2002. This initiative has created
many outreach implementation strategies targeted for the volunteer
and combination fire service. In addition, information from
the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (NFFF) Firefighter
Life Safety Initiatives project, along with several existing
practices in the emergency service community, and basic industry
were integrated into the research and development of this
program.
Year after
year, approximately 25 percent of the firefighters who are
killed in the line of duty are responding to or returning
from incidents, with the majority of the fatalities from vehicle
crashes. This represents the second leading cause of firefighter
fatalities (second only to heart attacks).
Additionally,
numerous firefighters have died working at emergency incidents
because of being struck by vehicles. In 2003, five firefighters
died from this cause, with six being killed in 2002 and three
in 2001. Deaths, although the most devastating, is only one
area of concern. Collisions cause injuries, which can be more
costly than deaths in terms of long-term pain, suffering and
expense. These issues affect operations of the Emergency Service
Organizations (ESO). In the case of volunteer operations,
no one joins the ESO to have a collision that disables them,
causes death, or costs the community more money than in the
form of buying vehicles. Therefore, the volunteer has a personal
responsibility in the safe operation of emergency vehicles.
The USFA,
NFFF, and NVFC are committed to mitigating the fatalities,
injuries, costs, and reduced efficiency associated with vehicle
crashes. The National Fallen Firefighters Foundation Life
Safety Initiatives of 2004 entitled "Everyone Goes Home"
focuses on the fact that YOU can make a difference by getting
back to basics. The premise is simple; it is the duty and
responsibility to make every day a training day, so that everyone
goes home. One specific initiative speaks to vehicle safety.
It is captioned as "Drive with care - everyone wears
a seatbelt, everyone; along with the concerns of safe speed"
"always under control", "stop at red lights",
"STOP", "remain seated and belted while in
motion", and "protect the roadway/scene". The
other four initiatives are no less dramatic to saving lives
and reducing injuries and damage. These, however, strike at
the heart of the emergency vehicle related causes that claim
over 25% of the firefighter fatalities each year. This is
further detailed in the 2004 USFA release "Emergency
Vehicle Safety Initiative."
Objective
NVFC,
working with VFIS, Inc., established a work plan to examine
recommendations from the USFA Fire Service Emergency Vehicle
Safety Initiative that apply to the volunteer fire and emergency
services and to develop specific implementation strategies
that will target the volunteer fire service.
|
|
Strategic
Approach
Reducing
emergency vehicle near misses, incidents, injuries, deaths,
related property damage and operational impacts starts with
identification of a core set of "Best Practices".
These "Best Practices" need to be implemented and
evaluated locally to match the needs and culture of the local
emergency service organization. To be effective in the change,
the organization's culture must be receptive to and accept
the changes. They do not have to like it, but must understand
the necessity. If the organization is not ready for the change,
it will not be successful. The organization's leaders must
first work at changing the attitude of the members, then implement
the changes.

The "Best
Practices" were developed from a series of emergency
service based issues and programs; however, they fit into
a more global approach driven from safety engineering principles.
These include a four-step safety engineering approach to limit
incidents and losses. They are listed in order of impact and
magnitude of results:
|
1. |
Engineer
out the problem. |
|
2. |
Implement
loss reduction techniques. |
|
3. |
Implement
administrative controls. |
|
4.
|
Train
personnel on how to use the proper safety devices and
to do the job correctly. |
These
are illustrated as follows:
| |
|
Engineer
out the problem: Rollover prevention built into fire apparatus. |
|
|
Implement
loss reduction techniques: Seat belts installed and used. |
|
|
Implement
administrative controls: Standard operating procedures/standard-operating
guidelines (SOP/SOG) implemented and enforced. |
|
|
Train
personnel to use the proper safety devices and to do the
job correctly: Actually drive the vehicle over-the-road
before responding to incidents. |
By now
you should begin to understand why it is necessary to discuss
and act on this issue:
|
|
The
injuries, deaths, property damage, and operational costs
are staggering |
|
|
It
is estimated that 93% of the driving public exhibits poor
driving habits |
|
|
There
is a lack of understanding of physical and dynamic forces
affecting emergency service vehicles, and |
|
|
There
is a general lack of focus on personal safety in the emergency
service community. |
|
|