|
The
role of fire fighters throughout the nation has changed
- probably forever. More accurately, it has dramatically
expanded to include homeland defense, a concept that,
prior to Sept. 11, 2001, had not been prominent in this
country's preparedness strategy since World War Two.
In
the immediate aftermath of the attacks on the World
Trade Center and the Pentagon, it became stunningly
clear that homeland defense has become a vital and frightening
aspect of a new war - a conflict against terrorism that
will be fought within America's borders, as well as
overseas. It soon became equally clear that, on the
home front, fire fighters will be at the front lines
of this unique kind of conflict.
Before
the attacks, fire fighters were concerned about putting
out blazes of all kinds and sizes and in the process,
protecting lives and property. They still are, just
as much as they ever were. However, now and for the
foreseeable future, they also must be concerned with
protecting lives and property from international terrorists.
The challenge has become a whole lot tougher, as if
it wasn't difficult enough already. The mission is enormous,
as are the stakes. Following are two excerpts from a
widely-quoted article headlined "City by city,
terror war goes local" that appeared in the prestigious
Christian Science Monitor:
Just
as America is relying on fire fighters, "the troops"
are relying on America's commitment to giving them the
resources they require to do the job.
"If
the World Trade Center attacks reinforced one lesson,
it's that cities are the first line of defense in most
any disaster. Until Sept. 11, most cities had some kind
of emergency response plans in place. But they were
often for hurricanes or industrial accidents or some
other more conventional calamity. Few, if any, were
prepared for the kind of biological, chemical, or other
evil deed that terrorists might devise."
In
other words, cities are likely battlegrounds in the
new war and the defense strategy on those local fronts
must take into account every kind of weapon from explosives
to bioagents and deadly chemicals. The key "troops"
in this defense effort? Fire fighters!
These
realities raise some significant issues. To effectively
meet their greatly expanded challenge, fire fighters
must be provided with specialized training and equipment.
Just as America is relying on fire fighters, "the
troops" are relying on America's commitment to
giving them the resources they require to do the job.
"Simply
stated, we must be trained for new contingencies and
equipped to deal with them," said MAFF President
Jim Thompson. "This includes training in biological
and chemical warfare. Similarly, training in the evacuation
of buildings, especially high-rise structures, should
be mandatory for all fire fighters. Further, all our
people should be inoculated against Hepatitis, Anthrax,
Smallpox and every other bio-agent terrorists might
use."
Among
other major considerations for protecting and arming
front-line personnel in the new war, certain equipment
and safety procedure requirements stand out.
"We
need to be able to protect ourselves when we enter a
suspected contaminated scene," Thompson said."
Merely having surgical rubber gloves is far from sufficient.
Hazardous material suits are an absolute must. In addition,
protocols for decontamination of facilities also need
to be established and implemented for fire fighters,
in the event they accidentally come into contact with
any biological or chemical agents."
The
Christian Science Monitor article, which pointed out
that not just New York City and Washington D.C. are
affected by the war on terrorism, but smaller towns
as well, noted that these issues are being addressed
in some jurisdictions: "...cities are already considering
dramatic action to pay for new personal protective equipment
and training," it said. "Kings County, Wash.,
which includes Seattle, is considering a one-time $3
million property tax increase to help pay for all the
new expenses."
It
also observed that before Sept. 11 "the federal
government had earmarked $8.7 billion to combat terrorism,"
but "only about $300 million was expected to go
to local authorities."
Amy
Smithson, a bio-terrorism expert at the Henry L. Stimson
Center in Washington, asserted that "The moneys
have to get to the locals."
Thompson
cited another crucial area of concern - the need for
true teamwork between all fire fighting and law enforcement
entities.
"This
is a very critical point all of us must address. We
have to work together by sharing information that will
result in saving innocent lives," he declared.
"President Bush's creation of a Homeland Defense
cabinet post and naming former Pennsylvania Governor
Thomas Ridge to the position was a very positive step
in this area."
Importantly,
the Homeland Security Council that was established concurrently
with Ridge's appointment is charged with managing the
development and implementation of homeland security
policies and coordinating these policies with state
and local governments.
"This
move will be wasted, however, unless agency disputes
and jealousies are set aside and a truly cooperative
effort is achieved on a continuing basis," Thompson
said.
How
important are factors such as interagency cooperation,
specialized training and proper equipment?
"The
US military would never think of sending troops into
combat that are poorly trained and insufficiently equipped,
and would never put its personnel at risk without having
gathered and shared all available intelligence,"
he declared.
"Simply
stated, we must be trained for new contingencies and
equipped to deal with them. This includes training in
biological and chemical warfare. Similarly, training
in the evacuation of buildings, especially high-rise
structures, should be mandatory for all fire fighters."
"To
do any of those things would ensure defeat. The same
is true on the home front. And, make no mistake, this
country is at war, has been since last Sept. 11, and
will continue to be both overseas and within its borders.
"In
the homeland defense against terrorists who are armed
with chemical or biological or more conventional weapons
such as bombs, it would be unthinkable to send first-line
troops - fire fighters - into battle without everything
they require to do the job."
|